Archive
by: MICHAEL CHEUNG
Cuil (pronounced “cool”), a startup search engine launched Monday, is the latest in a line of aspiring Google-killers, boasting an index of 120 billion Web pages, “three times more than any other search engine,” according to the co-founders of Cuil.
Built with $33 million in venture capital, Cuil is made up of an all-star team of Web technology veterans. The founders are Tom Costello, creator of Xift, and Anna Patterson, creator of Recall, a technology now used by Google.
However, based on its Monday debut, Cuil poses little immediate threat to industry leader Google, or even its nearest competitors, Yahoo and Microsoft, in either relevance or breadth of results it delivers.
Darren Wilson, our technical consultant, tested out Cuil, and reported a poor experience. Servers were often down, and it delivered irrevelent results with slow loading times.
In a search for “google,” Google delivered 2,740,000,000 results in .1 seconds. Cuil delivered 516,386,388 results in 9.8 seconds. In a search for “cuil,” Google delivered 745,000 results in .14 seconds, while Cuil delivered 121,578 results in 9 seconds. It appears that Cuil hasn’t even indexed itself yet; our search for “cuil” did not return the Cuil front page.
Not only were Cuil search results poor, but it lacked many of the features that Google offers. When you type in a misspelled word into Google, it will attempt to find the correct spelling. When you type in a misspelled word into Cuil, it displays the message “No results because of high load.”
Cuil’s claim to fame as the search engine with the biggest index has also been disputed. Google pointed out that it regularly crawls over 1 trillion web pages to Cuil’s 120 billion.
The one area where Cuil excels, however, is user privacy. While Google stores user-specific searches for up to 18 months, Cuil never stores personally identifiable information or search histories.